Eurosatory 2026 Defense News

The U.S. defense industry is using Eurosatory 2026 in Paris to bring battlefield-tested capabilities closer to allied armies and international buyers, with AUSA confirming in a video interview that 119 American companies are present in its U.S. Security and Defense Pavilion. The display matters as NATO forces seek faster access to equipment, systems, and industrial partners able to answer urgent combat requirements shaped by Ukraine.

Held from June 15 to 19 at the Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, the pavilion gives military users a direct view of U.S. solutions for modernization, interoperability, and wartime sustainment. Its scale also reflects a wider shift in allied procurement as NATO moves toward higher defense spending and a stronger industrial base by 2035.

Related topic: U.S. Army Reveals First Designs of Two XM30 AI Infantry Fighting Vehicle Candidates Replacing Bradley.

AUSA brings 119 U.S. defense companies to the U.S. Security and Defense Pavilion at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris, linking American industry with the U.S. Army, NATO armies, and international military buyers as allied procurement priorities shift under the pressure of the war in Ukraine and rising defense spending commitments (Picture source: Army Recognition Edit from AUSA Picture).

Brigadier General Jack Haley said AUSA has supported the U.S. Security and Defense Pavilion at Eurosatory for almost 30 years. That continuity is important because Eurosatory is not only a sales exhibition; it is also a policy and requirements environment where armies, procurement officials, and manufacturers compare national modernization needs against available industrial capacity. The U.S. pavilion includes a broad mix of exhibitors, including AeroVironment, AM General, Allison Transmission, Bell, Caterpillar, Dillon Aero, Echodyne, General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Gentex Corporation/Ops-Core, Govini, Inertial Labs, L3Harris Technologies, Leonardo DRS, Northrop Grumman, Oshkosh Defense, Persistent Systems, Red Cat Holdings, RTX, Shield AI, Skydio, Textron Systems, TrellisWare Technologies, and others. This composition reflects demand across several capability areas: tactical vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, soldier protection, communications, munitions, targeting, data, electronic systems, sustainment, and industrial components.

AUSA’s role is not equivalent to that of a procurement agency or a government acquisition office. It functions as a professional association that creates a structured meeting space between industry, soldiers, Army civilians, senior leaders, and foreign military representatives. AUSA’s own mission is built around three functions: educate, inform, and connect. Haley used the same formulation in the interview, but placed emphasis on the “connect” function at Eurosatory because the exhibition allows military users to see new technologies, question vendors, and relate equipment claims to operational problems rather than evaluate them only through brochures or remote briefings.

The operational context gives that connecting function more weight than it had before 2022. Ukraine has demonstrated the high attrition rate of ammunition, vehicles, sensors, drones, air defense interceptors, and electronic warfare systems in a prolonged conventional war. It has also shown that relatively low-cost systems, including small unmanned aerial vehicles, loitering munitions, tactical radios, counter-drone sensors, and commercial-derived software, can affect battlefield outcomes when they are integrated into units quickly. For NATO armies, the challenge is not simply to buy more equipment, but to identify which technologies can survive electronic warfare, scale under wartime production conditions, integrate with existing command-and-control networks, and be maintained by soldiers in field conditions.

That explains why the U.S. pavilion’s mixture of large prime contractors, mid-sized manufacturers, and specialized technology firms is relevant. Companies such as Oshkosh Defense, AM General, Mack Defense, Allison Transmission, and Caterpillar relate to mobility, logistics, powertrains, and heavy equipment support. Firms such as AeroVironment, Shield AI, Skydio, Red Cat Holdings, IMSAR, Echodyne, and Reveal Technology point to the expanding role of autonomous systems, small drones, radar, mapping, and reconnaissance. Persistent Systems, TrellisWare Technologies, Doodle Labs, L3Harris Technologies, Northrop Grumman, RTX, and Govini indicate demand for tactical networking, data integration, command systems, and decision-support tools. General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Olin-Winchester, Dillon Aero, U.S. Ordnance, and Barrett Firearms Manufacturing represent the continuing requirement for munitions, small arms, and weapons support in land warfare.

Haley’s comments also highlight a recurring acquisition problem: the gap between technological availability and fielded military capability. Many companies can demonstrate sensors, software, unmanned systems, communications equipment, or soldier gear at an exhibition, but operational adoption depends on testing, interoperability, cyber resilience, training burden, sustainment cost, export controls, and contracting timelines. For NATO forces, these issues are more complex because equipment must often operate across national formations, different radio architectures, different ammunition stocks, and separate procurement rules. A venue such as Eurosatory does not solve those problems, but it can expose them earlier by putting vendors, soldiers, requirements officers, and foreign delegations in the same room.

The spending environment increases the practical significance of these meetings. NATO’s current investment commitment requires Allies to move by 2035 toward 5 percent of GDP, including at least 3.5 percent for core defense requirements and up to 1.5 percent for security-related areas such as infrastructure, cyber defense, civil preparedness, resilience, innovation, and industrial capacity. NATO also reported that European Allies and Canada increased defense spending by 20 percent in 2025 compared with 2024, while their combined defense investment reached more than $574 billion in 2021-adjusted dollars. For U.S. industry, that creates an expanded export and partnership environment; for European governments, it creates a need to convert higher budgets into usable formations, stocks, and support systems rather than dispersed purchases.

European figures point in the same direction. European Defence Agency data show that EU member-state defense expenditure reached €343 billion in 2024 and was estimated at €381 billion in 2025, equal to about 2.1 percent of GDP. Defense investment was projected at nearly €130 billion in 2025. Those numbers matter because investment spending is the budget category most directly linked to equipment procurement, research and development, ammunition production, and modernization programs. A larger U.S. presence at Eurosatory therefore corresponds to a market in which European states are not only increasing budgets but also looking for near-term capabilities in air defense, long-range fires, drones, counter-drone systems, armored mobility, battlefield communications, and industrial surge capacity.

Haley was careful to describe AUSA as nonpartisan and not engaged in geopolitical advocacy. That distinction is relevant because a national pavilion at a defense exhibition can easily be read as an extension of state policy. AUSA describes itself as nonpartisan and apolitical, while its practical role at Eurosatory is to facilitate contact among the U.S. Army community, industry, and allied military representatives. In this case, the interview suggests that AUSA views the pavilion less as a political instrument and more as a mechanism for reducing friction between technical innovation and soldier requirements.

From an operational standpoint, the central issue is whether exhibitions can help move useful technology into units faster without bypassing validation. The answer is conditional. Direct exposure to soldiers and commanders can improve requirements definition, especially for systems influenced by recent combat experience, such as unmanned aerial vehicles, counter-drone sensors, electronic warfare tools, tactical communications, and mobile sustainment equipment. But the more decisive test comes after the exhibition: whether these systems can be evaluated in field trials, funded through procurement lines, produced at scale, integrated into allied command structures, and supported over years of service.

For the U.S. defense industrial base, the 119-company pavilion provides visibility at a time when NATO demand is expanding but competition is also increasing from European manufacturers, joint EU procurement initiatives, and national industrial policies. For NATO armies, the value lies in comparing U.S. equipment and technology against urgent capability gaps created by the war in Ukraine and by renewed emphasis on collective defense. The interview with Brigadier General Jack Haley offers a concrete view of how AUSA is positioning the U.S. pavilion as a meeting point between industry offerings and operational demand, rather than as a simple exhibition showcase.

Explore More Defense News: 

• Land Defense News

• Naval Defense News

• Defense Aerospace News

Team Wendy highlighted its RIFLETECH rifle-rated ballistic helmet and RECON Tactical protective helmet at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris. The display underscored growing military and security demand for head protection that improves survivability, comfort, and modular mission integration.

During interviews with Army Recognition at Eurosatory 2026, Team Wendy representatives outlined two helmet solutions designed for distinct operational requirements. Tom Bowan, Helmet Product Category Manager, presented the RIFLETECH rifle-rated ballistic helmet, while Bryan Javorek, Product Category Manager, introduced the RECON Tactical protective helmet. The company said the new designs emphasize enhanced protection, wearer comfort, and modular integration for personnel operating across increasingly complex threat environments.

Related Topic: Eurosatory 2026

Team Wendy unveiled the RIFLETECH ballistic helmet and RECON Tactical helmet at Eurosatory 2026, focusing on protection and comfort. (Picture source: Army Recognition)

The RIFLETECH helmet represents Team Wendy's latest development in rifle-rated ballistic head protection. Designed for military personnel facing high-threat battlefield conditions, the helmet combines advanced ballistic resistance with reduced weight and enhanced wearer comfort. The system incorporates the company's patented Seamless Shell Technology, which eliminates through-hole penetrations typically required for accessory attachment systems. By removing potential structural weak points, the design maintains consistent protective performance across the entire helmet shell.

According to information provided by Team Wendy during Eurosatory 2026, the RIFLETECH helmet achieves National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Level III ballistic protection under NIJ standards 0106.01 and 0108.01 while also providing resistance against higher-velocity threats. The helmet is designed to defeat 7.62×39 mm MSC rounds, 7.62×51 mm M80 Ball ammunition, M193 projectiles, and 9 mm threats at muzzle velocity. Fragmentation resistance reaches a V50 rating exceeding 4,430 feet per second (1,350 m/s), a performance level intended to address both ballistic and fragmentation hazards commonly encountered on modern battlefields.

Protection is provided by an ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) shell. This material is widely used in advanced military armor because of its high strength-to-weight ratio and ability to absorb impact energy. Combined with the seamless shell architecture, the design seeks to maximize energy dispersion while preserving structural integrity under ballistic impact.

The RIFLETECH helmet also incorporates Team Wendy's Air Fit liner system, developed through extensive research related to traumatic brain injury mitigation. Integrated ventilation channels, cooling fabrics, and strategically positioned comfort pads improve airflow and heat dissipation during prolonged operations. The helmet further includes the CAM FIT retention system featuring the BOA Fit System micro-adjustment mechanism, allowing operators to rapidly adapt fit and tension while maintaining stability during movement.

Night operations were also considered in the design. The helmet incorporates an optimized night-vision goggle (NVG) mounting shroud with enhanced shock cords to improve device retention. A low-profile reinforced polycarbonate rail system supports a wide range of accessories, including communication equipment, illumination devices, and mission-specific attachments. The Velcro configuration was developed with feedback from operational users to improve cable management and equipment integration.

Alongside the ballistic helmet, Team Wendy introduced the RECON Tactical helmet, a non-ballistic solution developed with a strong focus on rescue personnel, emergency responders, and teams operating in demanding environments where blunt-impact protection is more important than ballistic resistance. Presented by Bryan Javorek, the helmet is intended for rescue operations, mountaineering, whitewater interventions, emergency response missions, law-enforcement tasks, and military or special operations units requiring lightweight head protection with extensive accessory integration.

The RECON Tactical features a low-profile hybrid shell reinforced by a carbon-fiber crown panel designed to strengthen overhead impact protection while maintaining a lightweight configuration. The helmet complies with several recognized blunt-impact protection standards, including EN 12492:2012 for mountaineering, EN 1385:2012 for whitewater operations, NATO AEP-2902 Method H combat requirements, and the U.S. Army Combat Helmet (ACH) Generation II blunt-impact standard. These certifications reflect the helmet's positioning for diverse rescue environments, where personnel may face falling objects, head collisions, confined spaces, difficult terrain, and high-exertion operations.

Operational adaptability constitutes one of the system's principal characteristics. Universal military-standard interfaces allow the integration of night-vision systems, communication headsets, lights, goggles, thermal-imaging equipment, and other mission-specific accessories. A machined aluminum NVG shroud and standard military side rails provide compatibility with existing military equipment inventories, while also supporting rescue teams that increasingly rely on cameras, headlamps, communication gear, and identification accessories during complex interventions.

User comfort was another area emphasized by Team Wendy. The RECON Air Fit liner incorporates proprietary Zorbium impact-absorbing foam, cooling pads, and integrated ventilation channels that promote airflow during prolonged operations. For rescue personnel working in heat, confined spaces, rugged terrain, or water-related environments, this ventilation architecture is intended to reduce fatigue and improve endurance during missions that can last several hours.

The retention system employs the CAM FIT architecture with BOA technology, enabling rapid one-handed adjustment while maintaining a secure fit under dynamic movement conditions. The system can be configured with a sport-style chin strap or chin cup, allowing users to adapt the helmet to their operational profile. This is especially relevant for rescue teams, where head protection must remain stable during climbing, evacuation, vehicle extraction, rope operations, or movement through unstable terrain.

The complete RECON Tactical system weighs approximately 0.82 kg in medium/large configuration and 0.87 kg in extra-large size, making it suitable for extended missions where reducing operator fatigue remains a priority. Available accessory packages include camera adapters, headlamp mounts, chin-strap extensions, reflective identification kits, visor solutions, and vent-cover systems designed to adapt the helmet to different rescue and tactical scenarios.

The simultaneous introduction of RIFLETECH and RECON Tactical demonstrates Team Wendy's effort to address two distinct operational requirements. While the RIFLETECH helmet focuses on maximizing survivability against rifle-caliber threats and battlefield fragmentation, the RECON Tactical prioritizes rescue-oriented impact protection, ventilation, modularity, and long-duration comfort. As armed forces, emergency services, and specialized rescue units continue to operate across increasingly complex environments, helmet manufacturers face the challenge of balancing protection, weight, and adaptability, a trend clearly reflected in Team Wendy's latest developments showcased at Eurosatory 2026.

Lockheed Martin unveiled the HIMARS FLEX concept at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris, introducing a next-generation version of the M142 HIMARS that combines increased missile capacity with integrated air and missile defense functions. The development signals a push toward multi-mission battlefield systems as NATO allies seek mobile assets capable of both deep strike and defensive operations.

Revealed on June 16, HIMARS FLEX expands the combat-proven HIMARS family with a modular dual-pod launcher architecture that can carry significantly more munitions than the current single-pod configuration. Lockheed Martin says the design emphasizes flexibility, interoperability, and mission adaptability, allowing operators to tailor offensive and defensive effects from the same wheeled launcher. The concept also introduces the potential integration of air and missile defense interceptors, including PAC-3-class weapons, alongside traditional long-range precision strike munitions.

Related News: What Is U.S. Army HIMARS Rocket Artillery and Its Combat Capabilities? 

The HIMARS FLEX retains compatibility with the full family of existing launch pod munitions. (Picture source: Army Recognition)

Rather than replacing existing HIMARS launchers, HIMARS FLEX is presented as a modular architecture centered on the company's FLEXFires ecosystem. The most visible change is the introduction of a dual-pod launcher configuration, replacing the standard single-pod arrangement used by current HIMARS systems. This approach allows operators to carry twice as many munitions as the baseline launcher while preserving strategic mobility and compatibility with existing logistics chains. According to Lockheed Martin, the system remains transportable aboard a C-130 Hercules tactical transport aircraft, a characteristic that has long distinguished HIMARS from heavier tracked rocket artillery systems.

The announcement comes at a time when several European countries are evaluating future long-range fires capabilities and seeking solutions that combine precision strike capacity with greater operational resilience. The experience of recent conflicts has reinforced the importance of dispersed launchers that can relocate rapidly after firing while remaining connected to joint command-and-control networks.

The technical architecture of HIMARS FLEX retains compatibility with the full family of existing launch pod munitions. These include the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS), the Extended Range Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (ER GMLRS), the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), and the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM). GMLRS rockets provide precision engagement capability at ranges exceeding 70 kilometers, while PrSM is designed to engage targets beyond 400 kilometers. This compatibility allows current operators to leverage existing ammunition inventories without creating a separate supply chain.

A second technical element attracting attention is the integration of air and missile defense interceptors into the launcher architecture. Lockheed Martin states that HIMARS FLEX can employ Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) Missile Segment Enhancement interceptors as well as future Indirect Fire Protection Capability (IFPC) munitions. PAC-3 MSE is a hit-to-kill interceptor designed to defeat ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and aircraft through direct impact rather than fragmentation. Integrating such interceptors onto a highly mobile wheeled launcher could provide forward-deployed forces with a defensive layer that traditionally requires larger and less mobile air-defense formations.

The system also incorporates optional autonomy functions through the FLEXFires technology ecosystem. Lockheed Martin has not disclosed the exact level of autonomous operation available, but company officials describe the concept as supporting distributed operations and improving launcher survivability. If implemented as described, these functions could reduce crew workload, accelerate repositioning after firing, and contribute to more dispersed force structures.

The dual-pod configuration addresses one of the limitations often associated with the current HIMARS design. A standard launcher carries a single pod containing either six GMLRS rockets, two PrSM missiles, or one ATACMS missile. Once the ammunition is expended, the vehicle must be reloaded before conducting additional engagements. By carrying two pods, HIMARS FLEX can sustain fires longer, engage a greater number of targets during a single deployment, or combine offensive and defensive munitions on the same vehicle. A launcher could, for example, carry long-range strike missiles in one pod while retaining missile-defense interceptors in the second, allowing commanders to adapt rapidly to evolving battlefield conditions.

This flexibility could prove particularly valuable in distributed operations where forces operate across wide geographic areas and where resupply opportunities may be limited. The combination of increased ammunition capacity, rapid relocation capability, and compatibility with multiple munition types strengthens the launcher's utility across both high-intensity combat and deterrence missions. Furthermore, maintaining interoperability with NATO fire-control networks ensures that HIMARS FLEX can operate within existing multinational command structures without requiring extensive architectural changes.

Beyond its technical characteristics, HIMARS FLEX reflects broader shifts in allied defense planning. NATO members are investing heavily in long-range precision fires, integrated air and missile defense, and survivable command architectures as they adapt to a security environment shaped by peer competition and increasingly sophisticated missile threats. By merging strike and defensive functions within a single deployable system, Lockheed Martin is positioning HIMARS FLEX as a response to these evolving requirements. If adopted by current HIMARS operators, the concept could influence future force structures across Europe, the Indo-Pacific, and the Middle East, reinforcing collective deterrence while offering militaries a more adaptable approach to precision engagement and battlefield protection.

Written By Erwan Halna du Fretay - Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Erwan Halna du Fretay holds a Master’s degree in International Relations and has experience studying conflicts and global arms transfers. His research interests lie in security and strategic studies, particularly the dynamics of the defense industry, the evolution of military technologies, and the strategic transformation of armed forces.

Türkiye’s ASELSAN unveiled DRONEDEF at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris as a counter-drone layer within its Steel Dome air defense architecture, targeting one of the most urgent threats in modern land warfare. The system is designed to detect, disrupt, and destroy small unmanned aircraft that are increasingly cheap, numerous, hard to find, and capable of shaping tactical outcomes.

ASELSAN said on 16 June 2026 that DRONEDEF was presented alongside radar, electronic warfare, precision-strike, and autonomous systems that point to a wider push toward layered, networked defense. Its combination of sensors, electronic attack, directed energy, electromagnetic effects, and gun-based interception gives ground forces a flexible response against drone swarms and low-cost aerial threats.

Related topic: How Havelsan solves multi-domain data overload with AI-powered command architecture at Eurosatory 2026.

DRONEDEF should be read less as a single weapon and more as an engagement architecture for the lower tier of air defense. Its main elements are İHTAR for detection, classification, and soft-kill jamming; GÖKBERK for laser defeat; KORKUT 100/25 SB for 25 mm hard-kill interception; and EJDERHA for high-power electromagnetic attack against drone electronics. A live demonstration in Ankara on 6 June 2026 reportedly used wirelessly controlled drones, fiber-optic-controlled drones, and swarm-type approaches, with the system assigning different threats to İHTAR, EJDERHA, and GÖKBERK through a central command-and-control center. The reported detection range for DRONEDEF in that demonstration was 10 km, which gives operators time to classify the threat before selecting an effector rather than firing immediately at every low-altitude track.

The KORKUT 100/25 SB is the most important armament in DRONEDEF for targets that cannot be defeated reliably by radio-frequency jamming. The weapon uses a 25 mm automatic cannon firing ASELSAN’s ATOM 25 programmable airburst ammunition, with reported figures of about 600 rounds per minute, a muzzle velocity of roughly 1,100 m/s, 200 ready rounds, an effective anti-UAV range around 1,000–1,200 meters, and a secondary 7.62 mm coaxial machine gun for local defense. The turret includes radar and electro-optical sensors, automatic tracking, day and thermal cameras, and a laser rangefinder, while the gun elevation range has been reported from -20° to +70°. The military value of the ATOM 25 round is that it does not need a direct hit on a quadcopter or fixed-wing mini-UAV; it is programmed to burst near the target and create a fragment pattern against propellers, control surfaces, optics, wiring, batteries, or flight-control components.

This 25 mm layer fills a gap between small arms and missile-based air defense. Small arms have limited probability of kill against maneuvering drones, especially at night or in crosswinds, while short-range missiles are often too expensive for a target that may cost a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. A cannon firing airburst ammunition changes the cost equation, but it does not eliminate constraints: range is short, ammunition is finite, and safe firing arcs matter in urban terrain, near fuel storage, or around friendly troops. That is why DRONEDEF’s pairing of KORKUT with electronic and laser effectors is operationally relevant; commanders can reserve gun ammunition for drones that are autonomous, fiber-optic guided, jam-resistant, or already inside the defended perimeter.

GÖKBERK adds a different kind of hard-kill capability. ASELSAN’s published description of GÖKBERK 100/5 states that the system uses a 5 kW single-mode laser source developed by TÜBİTAK BİLGEM, EO/IR sensors, a stabilized gimbal, radar cueing, and an integrated jammer, with beam focusing up to 2,000 meters and practical drone neutralization at roughly 1 to 1.5 km. ASELSAN also states that the system can sustain laser firing for at least 10 minutes depending on configuration and mission conditions. In tactical terms, this makes GÖKBERK suitable for repeated engagements against small UAVs when weather, atmospheric obscurants, target material, and dwell time permit. It is less useful than a gun against fast fleeting targets in poor visibility, but it offers a low-cost shot, no ballistic debris, and better suitability for critical infrastructure, bases, energy sites, and headquarters where collateral effects are a planning factor.

İHTAR remains the first decision point in the chain. Public descriptions of İHTAR 100 identify a Ku-band pulsed-Doppler radar, track-while-scan operation, TV and thermal cameras, automatic video tracking, programmable jamming, directional and omnidirectional modes, and disruption of UAV communications, GPS, and swarm control links. That gives the defender a non-kinetic option against commercial and modified drones dependent on radio control, satellite navigation, or datalink video return. The limitation is equally important: fiber-optic FPV drones and pre-programmed autonomous aircraft reduce the value of jamming, making physical defeat by KORKUT, GÖKBERK, or electromagnetic damage by EJDERHA necessary. KALKAN II/M, displayed in the same Eurosatory package, supports the wider air picture with X-band 3D detection, Mode 5 IFF, and a reported range greater than 120 km, allowing DRONEDEF to sit inside a broader air-defense network rather than operate as an isolated guard system.

EJDERHA is relevant because it targets the electronics of mini and micro UAVs rather than the airframe. ASELSAN describes the EJDERHA/AD 200 as a high-power electromagnetic anti-UAV system intended to affect navigation, communications, and command/control systems, while later reporting on the EJDERHA 210 notes radar integration, enhanced electro-optics, improved engagement effectiveness, and serial production. Such systems are of interest against swarm raids because they may engage electronics faster than a gun can service individual targets, but they require careful electromagnetic safety planning around friendly radios, sensors, civilian infrastructure, and unmanned systems. KORAL AD, shown separately at Eurosatory, extends the same logic upward by detecting, deceiving, and jamming hostile radar systems, giving Steel Dome an electronic warfare layer against aircraft radars and supporting the wider suppression or denial of enemy air operations.

For European and NATO-aligned customers, the practical question is integration rather than display value. The Daimler Truck memorandum could reduce adoption barriers by placing ASELSAN sensors and effectors on truck families already familiar to allied logistics organizations, while the VIC TEC agreement is relevant to Latvia’s requirement for layered counter-UAS coverage in a Baltic operating environment where fixed infrastructure, dispersal sites, and mobile units all face drone surveillance and strike risks. ASELSAN says it exports to more than 96 countries, has a direct presence in 25 countries, and employs more than 14,000 personnel, which gives it industrial scale, but export success will depend on interoperability, national communications security, ammunition supply, training burden, and rules for operating high-power electromagnetic and laser weapons in peacetime airspace.

The main conclusion is that DRONEDEF reflects where short-range air defense is moving: mixed sensors, mixed effectors, centralized fire control, and a cost-based response to drones. Its strongest feature is not any single weapon, but the ability to match a jammer, laser, cannon, or electromagnetic effector to a specific threat type. Its vulnerabilities are also clear: weather can degrade lasers, jamming will not solve fiber-optic or autonomous drones, cannon range is limited, and electromagnetic weapons introduce deconfliction problems. DRONEDEF is therefore best assessed as a tactical node in a layered air-defense network, not as a stand-alone answer to the drone problem.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Written by Evan Lerouvillois, Defense Analyst.

Evan studied International Relations, and quickly specialized in defense and security. He is particularly interested in the influence of the defense sector on global geopolitics, and analyzes how technological innovations in defense, arms export contracts, and military strategies influence the international geopolitical scene.

Chinese manufacturer Ribri Acoustics & Optics presented its new Heimdall man-portable passive drone detection system at the Eurosatory 2026 defense exhibition in Paris. The 6.4 kg Tactical Multi-modal Sensor Cluster utilizes fused acoustic and optical nodes to provide dismounted infantry with early bearing and visual confirmation of low-altitude aerial threats before they enter visual range. This passive sensing approach is designed to counter the deployment of low-radar-cross-section, radio-silent, and fiber-optic-controlled FPV drones in contested frontline environments.

The Heimdall system combines a 48-cell MEMS microphone array offering a 600-meter detection range against small unmanned aerial systems with a tri-mode electro-optical and infrared camera architecture for target verification. The passive sensor configuration operates via TCP/IP and cellular networks within a MIL-STD-810G compliant housing to enable electronic warfare-immune perimeter surveillance without active radar emissions.

Related topic: China's Ribri Technology presents RB21H spherical robot for urban patrol missions

The Heimdall is a lightweight, portable device from Ribri Acoustics & Optics that protects soldiers by using specialized microphones and cameras to quietly listen for and spot incoming drones well before they can be seen. (Picture source: Army Recognition)

On June 19, 2026, the Chinese company Ribri Acoustics & Optics presented its new Heimdall system at Eurosatory 2026, a 6.4 kg man-portable Tactical Multi-modal Sensor Cluster (TMMSC) designed to give dismounted soldiers passive warning against drones before they enter visual range. The Heimdall, named after the Nordic god watching for invaders, combines the HUGIN acoustic node and the MUNIN EO/IR node in one sensor package: the acoustic provides early bearing and classification cues, and the optical provides visual confirmation and track refinement. The system’s mission is not target defeat, but the front end of the C-UAS chain: detection, classification, tracking, and confirmation of FPV drones, Class 2/3 UAS, and larger one-way attack drones such as the Shahed-136.

Its passive fusion approach also allows airspace and ground-perimeter monitoring without radar emission or active jamming, which is relevant for forward units that must maintain silence while still improving local drone warning time. The operational requirement behind the Heimdall is the limited ability of individual soldiers to detect small drones early enough to react. As seen daily in Ukraine, FPV drones and Class 2 or Class 3 UAS can approach at low altitude, use terrain masking and exploit vegetation, buildings, or cluttered terrain to reduce the value of visual scanning and radar-based detection.

Low radar cross-section targets close to ground clutter can be difficult for radar to separate from the background, while RF detection can lose value when drones fly autonomous routes, use pre-programmed navigation, or rely on fiber-optic control instead of a conventional radio-control link. The Heimdall addresses this narrow but important gap by adding a passive sensor layer that can generate an alert before a soldier sees the drone. Its intended use cases include perimeter surveillance, low-altitude warning, and local situational awareness at frontline positions, forward operating bases, infrastructure sites, vehicles, and watch towers. The HUGIN is the acoustic detection node and is built around a 48-cell MEMS microphone array.

The array operates across a 30 dB to 120 dB dynamic range and covers a 150-degree horizontal acoustic sector, making it a directional sensor for a defined approach axis rather than a full 360° perimeter sensor. Its detection range is 600 m (1,950 ft), against FPV or Class 3 drones and more than 5,000 m (16,400 ft) against Shahed-136-type targets. Edge-AI processing at the acoustic node further detects, classifies, and tracks rotary-wing UAS, combustion engines, and loitering munitions in noisy environments. In practical terms, the HUGIN turns rotor noise, engine signatures, and loitering munition sound patterns into a bearing cue that can initiate the alert cycle before the operator has any visual contact. The main operational value of the HUGIN is non-line-of-sight warning.

Using the DJI M350RTK as its reference target, the Heimdall system can detect a Class 3 drone from up to 600 meters away acoustically, and confirm it optically up to 4 kilometers using its zoom camera. (Picture source: Ribri Acoustics & Optics)

Optical sensors need a visual path, and radar performance can be reduced by low-altitude terrain masking, but sound can still reach the microphone array through or around vegetation, buildings, terrain folds, smoke, and darkness. The node does not depend on GNSS, RF control links, or onboard drone emissions, so it remains relevant against fiber-optic-controlled FPV drones, autonomous drones, and pre-programmed flight profiles. This matters most in the last tactical kilometer, where a low-flying FPV drone may become visible only shortly before impact or terminal approach. A 600 m acoustic cue against a small drone gives the unit approximately 30 to 60 seconds of warning, depending on the drone's speed, for search, confirmation, alerting, and possible handoff to an effector.

For its part, the more than 5 km range against Shahed-136-type targets supports earlier detection of louder, larger, combustion-powered threats. The MUNIN is the Heimdall's optical detection and confirmation node, and its function is to reduce ambiguity after an acoustic alert. Acoustic sensors can be affected by vehicles, generators, aircraft, industrial machinery, wind, and other battlefield or urban noise sources, which makes optical confirmation essential before a contact is treated as a drone threat. The MUNIN uses an Edge-AI tri-mode camera architecture with onboard signature recognition and classification, combining HD EO/IR panoramic vision with a telephoto or zoom camera. It can autonomously scan across daytime visual, infrared, and magnified visual channels, then use HUGIN cueing and panoramic detection to lock onto target coordinates.

Consequently, the MUNIN's role is to verify identity, refine the track, and reduce false alarms so that an operator or command system receives a more reliable contact rather than only an acoustic warning. The optical subsystem also separates wide-area search from target identification. The visible panoramic channel has a 7680 × 2160 resolution and a 130° × 42° field of view, giving it broad daylight search coverage across a large sector. The infrared panoramic channel has a 2560 × 512 resolution and a 125° × 26° field of view, adding night and low-light search through thermal contrast. The zoom EO channel has a 1920 × 1080 resolution and a variable 3.2° to 58.3° field of view, allowing the system to move from acquisition to closer identification.

Ribri Acoustics & Optics also showcased the RH20Y, a compact long-range acoustic hailing device that combines directional voice projection with integrated camera and laser systems for surveillance, warning, and security operations. (Picture source: Army Recognition)

Against a DJI M350RTK, used as the Class 3 reference target, the Heimdall's visible panoramic performance reaches 1.4 km, the infrared channel reaches 400 m and the zoom EO channel reaches 4 km. Against Class 2 drones, the corresponding detection ranges are 800 m, 250 m, and 2 km, which shows that the zoom EO channel provides the longest optical confirmation range when line of sight exists, while the panoramic channels support early sector search. The Heimdall’s operating sequence is therefore structured around sensor complementarity. The HUGIN starts the alert cycle by detecting and classifying an acoustic signature across its 150-degree sector, then the MUNIN searches the cued area with panoramic EO/IR sensors and uses the zoom EO channel to confirm and refine the target track.

This division matters because acoustic sensing can warn through non-line-of-sight conditions but cannot provide the same visual identification value as EO/IR imagery, while optical sensing can confirm the object but depends on visibility, line of sight and sufficient target contrast. Ribri's Heimdall, therefore, acts as a passive detection and confirmation node, as its value is highest when connected to local warning systems, C2 networks, or short-range effectors that can act on the confirmed track. The Heimdall’s physical configuration supports man-portable deployment. The sensor cluster weighs 6.4 kg and measures 505 × 326 × 150 mm. It operates from -30°C to +65°C, uses IP65 ingress protection, and meets MIL-STD-810G environmental requirements, giving it the environmental tolerance needed for exposed field use, vehicle mounting, or tower installation.

Networking is provided through TCP/IP and 4G/5G, enabling remote monitoring and connection into wider command-and-control architectures. By including optical detectors, acoustic detectors, Edge-AI processing, and low-SWaP packaging, a single Heimdall can be moved, installed, and networked without the footprint of a larger radar-based C-UAS sensor. In summary, the Heimdall’s tactical feature set includes passive detection, electronic warfare immunity, sensor fusion, fast deployment, modular design, C2 integration, open architecture, all-weather reliability, and detection of low, slow, and small targets. In frontline C-UAS missions, it can cue portable kinetic interceptors by providing warning, direction, classification, and optical confirmation for low-altitude defense.

In maritime and coastal roles, it can support vessel escort, port security, and anti-piracy awareness by adding local passive surveillance around ships, harbor facilities, and coastal sites. In critical infrastructure protection, it can serve as a forward sensor in perimeter networks protecting power facilities, ports, communications nodes, or other fixed sites. At forward operating bases, its passive mode allows continuous surveillance without radar emissions that could attract anti-radiation missiles or reveal coordinates to signals intelligence. As a single Heimdall node only covers sectors rather than a complete perimeter, multiple nodes may be required around a defended site to create a full circular situational awareness, but this latter point depends on the user's requirements.

Also present on the stand, the LPW90Z, a vehicle-mounted LEP searchlight with a range of up to 9,000 m, and the RP41C, a long-range opto-acoustic hailing device delivering communications and warnings at distances up to 2.5 km. (Picture source: Army Recognition)

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

Aksum Group used Eurosatory 2026 in Paris to outline its entry strategy for the European defense and security market, presenting a portfolio that combines armored vehicles, armored boats, ballistic glass, and steel engineering. In an interview with Defense Web TV, Group Sales Director Tamer Jabar said the company sees Europe as the next step after establishing industrial activities in the United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan.

The company’s presence at the exhibition reflects a broader effort to position Aksum as a supplier of protected mobility solutions for military, internal-security, border-control, and maritime-security users, with an emphasis on configurable vehicles, local manufacturing experience, and integrated armor production capabilities.

Related topic: Saudi Arabia Uses World Defense Show 2028 to Advance Defense Localization Under Vision 2030.

Aksum Group presented its land and maritime protected mobility portfolio at Eurosatory 2026, outlining a European expansion strategy based on armored vehicles, armored boats, ballistic glass, and steel engineering capabilities (Picture source: Army Recognition Group).

The industrial footprint is the central point of the story. Aksum is not only marketing finished armored vehicles; it is presenting a manufacturing chain that includes vehicle conversion, armored hull work, marine craft, ballistic glass, and steel engineering. That matters for European and Middle Eastern buyers because light protected vehicles are often modified after initial purchase for local communications, weapons, seating layouts, command equipment, medical kits, riot-control fittings, or border-surveillance payloads. A company that controls armor installation, glazing, and steel fabrication can shorten some adaptation cycles, although certification, ballistic testing, after-sales support, and documentation remain decisive factors for serious government procurement. Aksum’s existing armored vehicle business includes tactical vehicles, armored sedans and SUVs, and special-purpose vehicles, while its product materials state that passenger cabins, roofs, and floors can be protected against ballistic fire and blast effects, with ballistic glass, fuel tank protection, upgraded braking systems, and run-flat tire inserts offered across its vehicle work.

The technical discussion should start with the company’s tactical vehicle line rather than with brand positioning. The Combat Aksum tactical vehicle is listed with a 4.5-liter V8 diesel engine, a five-speed manual transmission, 195 hp at 3,300 rpm, a ten-person capacity, and dimensions of 5,511 mm in length, 2,131 mm in width, and 2,772 mm in height. Optional equipment includes a 360-degree mounted gun turret, blast-resistant seats, internal and external CCTV cameras, siren, public-address and intercom systems, a fire suppression system, window gun ports, roof-mounted strobe lighting, and upgraded heavy-duty brakes and suspension. Those details describe a vehicle intended less for heavy mechanized combat than for protected patrol, convoy escort, border movement, base security, and internal-security intervention. The ten-person layout also indicates a troop-carrying role: driver, commander, and an embarked team can move under armor and dismount at an incident location.

The armament options should be assessed in operational terms. A 360-degree roof gun turret gives all-round coverage from the upper arc of the vehicle and can normally support a light or medium machine gun depending on customer integration, mount strength, roof reinforcement, and national weapon regulations. A turret of this type is useful during convoy halts, checkpoint defense, perimeter security, and ambush response because it gives the crew a higher observation point and a means of suppressive fire without forcing immediate dismount. The gun ports have a different tactical purpose. They allow personnel inside the cabin to cover blind arcs, respond to close threats, or deter an attacker during the first seconds of contact. This is not a substitute for a stabilized remote weapon station or an infantry fighting vehicle turret; it is a practical configuration for security missions where the expected threat is small arms, improvised explosive devices, roadblocks, or armed criminals rather than enemy armor.

Aksum’s heavier Max DS gives a second reference point for the company’s protected mobility range. It is listed with a 6.7-liter inline-six diesel engine, six-speed automatic transmission, 345 hp at 2,400 rpm, a twelve-person capacity, and dimensions of 6,407 mm in length, 2,438 mm in width, and 3,397 mm in height. The same optional equipment set appears, including the 360-degree turret, blast-resistant seating, CCTV, fire suppression, window gun ports, and upgraded brakes and suspension. Compared with the Combat Aksum, the Max DS is closer to a protected personnel carrier for larger intervention teams or military units operating in higher-risk areas. The automatic transmission and higher engine output are relevant for a heavier vehicle that must carry armor, crew, equipment, water, ammunition, communications gear, and potentially a roof weapon while maintaining acceptable road mobility. The operational trade-off is predictable: more internal volume and protection increase weight, height, and visual signature, which can limit use in narrow urban streets or low-profile surveillance tasks.

The company’s portfolio also includes smaller and lighter tactical vehicles that may be more suitable for police, SWAT, or low-visibility security use. The Combat S is listed with a 4.5-liter V8 diesel engine, 195 hp, a five-speed manual transmission, four-person capacity, and dimensions of 5,195 mm by 1,790 mm by 2,675 mm, while the Max S carries eight personnel with the same 4.5-liter V8 and 195 hp output. These vehicles occupy a different niche from the Max DS: they provide protected movement and limited armed overwatch without the footprint of a larger armored personnel carrier. For European users, this distinction matters. Police intervention units may need ballistic protection and rapid dismount access in car parks, industrial zones, or narrow streets, while border guards may prioritize endurance, cameras, communications, and maintainability. Military customers may demand a higher level of mine protection, protected seating, radios, and weapon integration.

Aksum’s maritime branch broadens the relevance of the group’s presence at Eurosatory. Aksum Marine states that its facility in Umm Al Quwain covers 30,000 square feet, has capacity for up to 10 boats per month, uses CNC laser-cutting equipment for armored steel, and is located close enough to the water to support in-motion testing. This matters because many security requirements are now cross-domain: ports, river approaches, offshore energy sites, border waterways, and coastal facilities often require both protected road movement and armored or special-purpose boats. Aksum’s value is therefore strongest for customers that need a package of land and maritime protected mobility rather than a single vehicle type. The company’s Uzbekistan connection also gives it a manufacturing story outside the Gulf, with a modern plant in Chirchik producing armored military and commercial vehicles under the Aksum brand.

The unanswered questions are as important as the stated capabilities. For defense ministries, the next level of assessment would focus on certified ballistic and mine protection levels, test house documentation, payload after armoring, gross vehicle weight, axle loading, turning radius, braking distance, thermal management, radio integration, spares availability, and warranty support in Europe. The visible armament options are useful for patrol and intervention missions, but serious military buyers will also examine whether the roof structure can accept a remotely controlled weapon station, electro-optical sight, smoke grenade launchers, anti-drone sensors, or encrypted battle management equipment without degrading stability and mobility. Aksum’s appearance at Eurosatory 2026, therefore, marks an early European business-development phase, not yet proof of market penetration. Its prospects will depend on whether the company can convert manufacturing breadth into certified, supportable, mission-specific vehicles that meet the more demanding procurement standards of European and allied security forces.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

MOOG and Milrem Robotics presented a new joint robotic combat solution during Eurosatory 2026 in Paris, France. The system combines Milrem’s HAVOC 8x8 Robotic Combat Vehicle with Moog’s Reconfigurable Integrated-Weapons Platform, known as RIwP. Developed with NATO’s Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative in mind, this configuration responds to the growing need for layered protection against drones, aerial threats, and contested border environments. Its relevance lies in the way it brings together autonomy, air defense effectors, electronic warfare, and beyond-line-of-sight targeting on an unmanned ground platform.

Related Topic: DSEI 2025: Milrem's UGV And Moog's Launcher Team Up For Autonomous Air Defense On The Battlefield

MOOG and Milrem Robotics unveiled a new unmanned combat vehicle at Eurosatory 2026 that combines the HAVOC 8x8 robotic vehicle with the RIwP turret, integrating air defense, counter-drone, electronic warfare, and long-range targeting capabilities to address battlefield lessons emerging from the war in Ukraine and strengthen NATO's Eastern Flank défenses (Picture Source: Army Recognition Group)

The HAVOC 8x8 RCV equipped with RIwP made its debut at Eurosatory 2026, where Milrem Robotics and Moog presented it as part of a broader approach to eastern flank deterrence. The system is designed around lessons drawn from the war in Ukraine, where the density of unmanned aerial systems, electronic warfare, and long-range targeting has reshaped the way ground forces operate. By integrating a robotic combat vehicle with a layered weapons platform, the two companies aim to demonstrate how unmanned and autonomous systems could support continuous defense architectures along NATO’s eastern border.

Beyond the industrial presentation, the HAVOC 8x8 RCV fitted with RIwP reflects a broader shift in NATO’s approach to border defense, especially along the eastern flank. Rather than relying only on conventional manned air-defense vehicles, the concept places an unmanned combat platform forward in areas where drones, artillery observation, electronic warfare, and long-range fires create constant risk for soldiers. In this role, the vehicle could operate as a distributed node in a wider defensive network, combining surveillance, electronic denial, and kinetic engagement while reducing the exposure of crews in the most contested zones.

The operational concept focuses on an interoperable robotic approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative, combining air and land domain capabilities. According to MOOG, the HAVOC RCV with RIwP is intended to support Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems missions, Very Short-Range Air Defense, and Short-Range Air Defense. This configuration reflects the increasing requirement for mobile systems able to detect, deny, and engage aerial threats while reducing the exposure of military personnel in highly contested areas and challenging border zones.

Moog’s RIwP turret is configured for a fully layered air defense mission set. In this configuration, it can host a self-defense weapon, a medium-caliber cannon, two different missile canisters, a long-range RF jammer, and a tethered drone for Beyond Line of Sight targeting. This combination enables the platform to address different types of threats with both lethal and non-lethal effectors, ranging from drone denial through electronic warfare to missile engagement against aerial targets. The use of a tethered drone is also relevant for beyond-line-of-sight targeting, as it can extend the vehicle’s observation range in forested, urban, or broken terrain without requiring a manned reconnaissance team to move forward.

The weapons and effectors associated with the RIwP configuration include SHORAD missiles for aerial threats, a 30×113 mm cannon using proximity-fused ammunition for counter-UAS missions and precision fire, a 7.62 mm machine gun for close-range protection, and a long-range RF jammer for non-lethal drone threat denial. This layered configuration is significant from a cost-per-engagement perspective. On a battlefield increasingly shaped by small drones, loitering munitions, and reconnaissance UAVs, commanders need several response options instead of relying only on expensive interceptors. Electronic attack can be used to disrupt selected drone threats, cannon fire can address close or medium-range targets, while missiles can be reserved for more demanding aerial threats.

Eurosatory 2026 marks the first time the RIwP weapon system has been integrated on a Milrem platform, strengthening the HAVOC 8x8 RCV with beyond-line-of-sight targeting and engagement capabilities. Moog also showcased another integration at the exhibition, the Flexible Mission Platform developed in collaboration with Milrem Robotics. From an industrial perspective, this integration illustrates the growing convergence between European unmanned ground systems and modular weapons platforms. Milrem’s experience with robotic vehicles, including the THeMIS unmanned ground vehicle and the HAVOC RCV, combined with Moog’s reconfigurable turret technology, gives the concept a wider significance than a single vehicle presentation.

Richard Allen-Miles, EMEA Capture Lead at Moog, stated that the collaboration with Milrem Robotics highlights European land-domain capabilities and marks the first time RIwP has been displayed in this configuration in Europe. He noted that the system was designed with the eastern front in mind and provides C-UAS, VSHORAD, and SHORAD capabilities. Paul Clayton, Industrial Partnerships Director at Milrem Robotics, said the integration demonstrates how trusted transatlantic and European industrial partnerships can rapidly deliver capabilities responding to the evolving threat environment, while reducing risks to personnel through autonomy and modular mission systems.

The presentation of the HAVOC 8x8 RCV with RIwP at Eurosatory 2026 places robotic combat vehicles at the center of NATO’s evolving deterrence posture on its eastern flank. By combining Milrem’s unmanned ground vehicle expertise with Moog’s modular weapons platform, the concept shows how future border defense could rely more heavily on autonomous systems, layered air defense, electronic warfare, and remote targeting. As drone threats continue to shape modern combat, this configuration underlines a broader shift toward protecting maneuver forces while keeping soldiers farther from the most exposed areas of the battlefield.

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.

The Turkish defense company Havelsan presented its multi-domain connected defense architecture at the Eurosatory 2026 exhibition in Paris to address data saturation challenges across allied armed forces. This deployment focuses on integrating diverse streams of sensor and situational data into a unified, force-level operational picture to accelerate tactical decision-making loops. By standardizing communication layers and command frameworks, the technology establishes interoperability between conventional manned forces and distributed autonomous networks.

Havelsan utilized the international exhibition to speak about its Advent Combat Management System and MAIN artificial intelligence framework configured for multi-domain joint operations. The architecture connects air, land, and naval autonomous platforms with tactical data links to shorten timelines between target detection and defensive response.

Related topic: Havelsan unveils Advent-AI naval combat system to counter swarm attacks and electronic warfare

Havelsan displays its multi-domain network architecture at Eurosatory 2026 to resolve data saturation by integrating advanced command frameworks, artificial intelligence, and autonomous platforms for accelerated tactical decision-making. (Picture source: Havelsan)

The Turkish company Havelsan used Eurosatory 2026 to position itself around a challenge that increasingly shapes military modernization programs across NATO, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: the growing gap between the volume of information available to military forces and the ability of command structures to process it fast enough to influence operations. Modern formations routinely operate with surveillance radars, electro-optical systems, sonars, electronic support measures, tactical data links, satellites, unmanned systems, aircraft, ships, ground vehicles, and headquarters that generate information simultaneously.

The problem is no longer the detection of targets, threats, or activities, but the integration of thousands of individual data points into a coherent operational picture that can support decisions at tactical, operational, and strategic levels. Havelsan's portfolio, displayed at Eurosatory, reflects this requirement, as the company concentrates on the integration architecture linking command-and-control systems, combat management systems, mission management software, Tactical Data Links, artificial intelligence applications, autonomous vehicles, and simulation environments. The common objective across these capabilities is to shorten the period between detection, assessment, decision, tasking, and response while allowing land, naval, air, and unmanned assets to operate within the same information environment.

Eurosatory 2026 also gives Havelsan a venue to meet military users, industry representatives, business partners, and potential customers, with discussions focused on current operational needs, future requirements, interoperability, mission management, multi-domain operations, and connected defence environments across land, naval, air, and joint missions. Command and control remains the foundation of that architecture because it determines how information moves between sensors, headquarters, and operational units. Havelsan's systems connect command centers, deployed formations, surveillance networks, and response forces into a shared framework supporting planning, monitoring, information fusion, force coordination, and decision support.

In border security, for instance, this can involve the integration of ground surveillance radars, electro-optical towers, UAV feeds, patrol units, and reaction forces into a single command structure capable of tracking events across large geographic areas. In naval and joint force environments, the same logic applies to fleets, aircraft, submarines, shore facilities, and unmanned assets. The operational value of these systems lies in reducing the delays created when information must pass through multiple reporting chains before reaching decision makers. As military organizations increasingly pursue multi-domain operations, command-and-control architectures are becoming less focused on individual headquarters and more focused on maintaining a continuously updated operational picture shared across multiple echelons and services. 

The strongest example of this integration approach is the Advent Combat Management System, which has become the centerpiece of Havelsan's naval activities. The Advent combines sensor management, track management, threat evaluation, tactical decision support, weapons control, communications management, and Tactical Data Links within a single combat-management architecture. Unlike earlier combat systems designed primarily for individual ships, the Advent was developed around a force-level concept that allows multiple participants to operate within the same tactical environment. The system is currently fitted on Ada-class corvettes, İstif-class frigates, TCG Anadolu, and other Turkish naval assets, while export customers include Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and Ukraine.

The Advent also exists as a broader family of systems, including the Advent CMS for surface combatants, the Advent Müren for submarines, the Advent Marti for naval aviation, the Advent Ufuk for shore facilities, the Advent Kalyon for mine-warfare vessels, and the Advent Rota for unmanned systems. This expansion indicates that Havelsan is establishing a common operational architecture across multiple naval mission areas rather than maintaining separate combat-management solutions for each user category. Mission management occupies an increasingly important role because modern military operations are shifting from platform-centric concepts toward networked force structures involving large numbers of manned and unmanned assets.

Havelsan's Advent Rota architecture supports mission planning, task assignment, execution monitoring, payload management, sensor control, and mission coordination for unmanned systems. The practical significance of such a system becomes evident when multiple UAVs, unmanned surface vessels, unmanned ground vehicles, ships, aircraft, and command centers must operate simultaneously within the same operational area. Reconnaissance, surveillance, maritime security patrols, border security operations, force protection missions, and distributed naval activities increasingly require commanders to coordinate dozens of assets rather than a handful of vehicles. Mission management software, therefore, becomes less about controlling a single vehicle and more about allocating tasks, synchronizing sensor coverage, managing mission priorities, and maintaining awareness of asset status across an entire operational network.

The objective is to ensure that unmanned systems contribute directly to force-level objectives rather than operating as isolated reconnaissance assets. Tactical Data Links form the communications layer that enables this broader architecture to function. Advent integrates Link-11, Link-16, Link-22, SIMPLE, JREAP, and VMF, allowing the exchange of tactical tracks, engagement information, mission updates, targeting data, platform status, and operational messages between participating units. Link-16 remains one of the most widely used tactical data-link standards among NATO members and partners, while Link-22 is intended to expand networking capacity and improve resilience in contested environments.

By integrating multiple standards simultaneously, Havelsan seeks to reduce the barriers that often exist between naval, air, and land systems operating under different communications architectures. The operational significance extends beyond connectivity. A shared tactical picture allows participants to work from the same recognized operational environment, reducing the risk of duplicate tracking, conflicting reports, or delayed dissemination of threat information. For export customers seeking interoperability with NATO forces or coalition partners, compatibility with established Tactical Data Link standards remains a significant procurement consideration. Artificial intelligence constitutes a separate effort to address information saturation inside military command systems. Havelsan's MAIN artificial intelligence framework is intended for secure military and government networks, while Advent-AI integrates AI capabilities directly into combat management workflows.

Functions include anomaly detection, contact classification, information retrieval, maintenance support, navigation assistance, platform monitoring, and voice command interaction. These capabilities address a practical operational problem: modern operators frequently face more information than they can manually evaluate within the time available. A combat management system (CMS) may receive inputs from multiple sensors, external tactical links, intelligence feeds, and platform-health monitoring systems simultaneously. AI-enabled functions can assist by identifying unusual behavior, prioritizing alerts, classifying contacts, filtering information, and reducing routine workload. Within naval environments, these capabilities also support monitoring of system performance and navigation functions while helping operators focus attention on activities requiring human judgment.

The underlying objective is not automation for its own sake but increasing the speed and quality of human decision-making in information-dense operational environments. Havelsan's autonomous systems portfolio illustrates how the company intends to populate this architecture with operational assets across multiple domains. In the air, the Baha and Bulut provide intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and border security capabilities. On land, the Barkan family is intended for reconnaissance, patrol missions, force protection, logistics support, and manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T). At sea, the Sancar and Çaka support maritime surveillance, coastal security, patrol activities, intelligence collection, and broader maritime security missions.

What distinguishes these systems within Havelsan's portfolio is their intended integration into command-and-control and mission management networks rather than their individual performance characteristics. The company's concept increasingly revolves around connecting unmanned air, land, and maritime vehicles through common mission management architectures, Tactical Data Links, and command systems so that sensor information collected by one asset can immediately improve decisions affecting the wider force. This approach reflects a broader shift within military modernization efforts toward distributed operations in which manned and unmanned systems function as components of a larger operational network rather than independent capabilities. 

Simulation and training technologies complete the portfolio by connecting force preparation to operational execution. Havelsan's activities in this sector include flight simulators, naval simulators, armored-vehicle simulators, tactical trainers, electronic warfare training systems, and Live-Virtual-Constructive environments. These capabilities support crew certification, readiness generation, mission rehearsal, doctrine development, tactical experimentation, and collective training activities. Havelsan’s wider technology base also includes enterprise software solutions for defence, security, government, and civilian users, while its mission-critical systems serve air, land, naval, and civilian customers in different regions. 

The significance of simulations has also increased as military systems become more complex, more networked, and more expensive to operate. Modern training increasingly requires crews, operators, commanders, and headquarters staffs to practice within representative operational environments before deployment. By linking simulation, command-and-control systems, mission-management architectures, autonomous systems, artificial intelligence applications, and combat-management technologies, Havelsan's Eurosatory 2026 portfolio reflected a consistent theme: the construction of a common operational architecture capable of connecting sensors, commanders, manned forces, unmanned systems, and decision-support tools across the full cycle of planning, training, mission execution, and operational assessment. During Eurosatory 2026, visitors can meet the Havelsan team at Hall 5A, Stand E390, to examine its command and control, combat management, mission management, Tactical Data Links, artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and simulation technologies.

Written by Jérôme Brahy

Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

South African defense company Paramount unveiled the latest Mbombe 4 MRAP vehicle at Eurosatory 2026, showcasing upgraded digital technologies, survivability features, and modular mission systems. The enhancements reflect growing military demand for network-enabled armored vehicles that can adapt to multiple operational roles while maintaining high levels of protection and mobility.

Displayed with an advanced transparent information panel detailing its specifications and operational capabilities, the Mbombe 4 highlights Paramount's focus on digitally managed battlefield operations. The 4x4 armored vehicle combines Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) protection with configurable mission packages, enabling operators to tailor the vehicle for a range of security, reconnaissance, patrol, and combat support missions across diverse environments.

Related Topic: Eurosatory 2026 Official News Online and Web TV 

The Mbombe 4 represents the lightest member of the family while retaining many of the survivability characteristics associated with larger armored vehicles (Picture source: Army Recognition)

The Mbombe family has become one of Paramount's flagship armored vehicle programs, designed to address modern operational requirements ranging from counterinsurgency missions to conventional military operations. The Mbombe 4 represents the lightest member of the family while retaining many of the survivability characteristics associated with larger armored vehicles. Unlike traditional MRAP designs that often sacrifice mobility for protection, the Mbombe concept seeks to balance both requirements through a monocoque hull architecture and advanced suspension systems.

The company highlights several technological features that distinguish the vehicle within the competitive 4x4 protected mobility segment. Information presented at Eurosatory 2026 indicates that the Mbombe 4 is equipped with a remotely operated weapon station compatible with multiple weapon systems up to 12.7 mm caliber while providing a 360-degree engagement capability. Remote weapon stations reduce crew exposure to enemy fire by allowing operators to detect, track, and engage targets from inside the protected cabin. Such systems increasingly incorporate stabilized optics, thermal imaging sensors, and digital fire-control functions that improve effectiveness in day and night operations.

Protection remains a central element of the vehicle's design. The Mbombe 4 is certified to STANAG 4569 Level 3 ballistic protection and can be upgraded to Level 4, according to data displayed by Paramount during the exhibition. The vehicle also offers mine and improvised explosive device resistance compliant with STANAG 4569 Level 4A and 4B standards, protecting 10 kg TNT detonations beneath a wheel or under the hull. These protection levels are particularly relevant in contemporary operational environments where mines and roadside explosive devices continue to represent a persistent threat to military forces and peacekeeping contingents.

Several technical characteristics provide insight into the vehicle's engineering approach. The Mbombe 4 has a gross vehicle weight of 16,000 kg and can accommodate a crew of two plus six personnel. Power is supplied by a Cummins ISB 6.7 diesel engine producing 336 kW, equivalent to approximately 450 horsepower, coupled to an automatic transmission driving all four wheels. The combination enables a maximum road speed of 140 km/h and an operational range of up to 800 km. The vehicle also incorporates a Central Tyre Inflation System (CTIS), allowing operators to adjust tire pressure according to terrain conditions without leaving the cabin, thereby improving traction on soft ground, sand, mud, or damaged road networks.

Mobility enhancements extend beyond raw engine performance. Paramount integrates an independent hydropneumatic suspension system with lightweight compact A-arms and run-flat tire capability. Hydropneumatic suspensions provide improved ride quality and wheel articulation compared with conventional systems, helping maintain vehicle stability during high-speed maneuvering and cross-country movement. The Mbombe 4's ground clearance of 430 mm and its ability to negotiate gradients of 60 percent and side slopes of 35 percent support operations across demanding terrain. Environmental specifications displayed at the exhibition indicate operation between minus 20°C and plus 55°C as well as altitude capability reaching 4,000 meters, broadening deployment options across diverse theaters.

Beyond its technical specifications, the vehicle's modular internal architecture reflects changing military requirements. Paramount promotes configurable seating arrangements and mission-specific interior layouts that allow rapid adaptation for troop transport, command and control, patrol, special operations, casualty evacuation, or internal security missions. Such flexibility reduces fleet complexity by enabling a single vehicle type to perform multiple roles while maintaining common logistics and maintenance requirements.

The Mbombe 4 is designed to support highly mobile operations where protection, speed, and adaptability must coexist. Its combination of mine protection, off-road performance, and remote weapon integration allows units to conduct reconnaissance, convoy escort, border security, and rapid reaction missions while maintaining a relatively small logistical footprint. The ability to rapidly reconfigure the interior further supports mission tailoring at the unit level, enabling commanders to adapt force packages to evolving operational demands. In contested environments, the protected crew compartment and remote weapon station enhance survivability while preserving situational awareness and combat effectiveness.

The technologies showcased by Paramount at Eurosatory 2026 illustrate wider developments shaping the international armored vehicle market. Many armed forces are seeking protected mobility solutions capable of responding to both conventional threats and asymmetric challenges without requiring heavy tracked vehicles. As defense budgets increasingly prioritize versatility and lifecycle efficiency, vehicles such as the Mbombe 4 may attract interest from countries seeking to modernize their land forces while maintaining deployment flexibility. The spread of modular protected vehicles equipped with digital systems, advanced protection packages, and adaptable mission architectures is likely to influence procurement strategies across Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Asia, contributing to the continuing evolution of ground force capabilities in an increasingly complex security environment.

Czechoslovak Group (CSG) unveiled the KARPAT CFL-120 tracked combat vehicle at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris, combining main battle tank firepower with a lighter and more deployable design. The vehicle highlights Europe's push to field heavily armed armored forces that can move faster, deploy more easily, and reduce logistical strain across NATO operations.

Developed by CSG in cooperation with Leonardo, FNSS, and MSM Land Systems, the KARPAT CFL-120 is designed to bridge the gap between traditional main battle tanks and lighter armored combat vehicles. The program reflects lessons emerging from the war in Ukraine, where mobility, sustainment, and rapid deployment have become increasingly important alongside battlefield firepower. CSG positions the vehicle as a solution for armed forces seeking strong direct-fire capability without the weight and support requirements associated with conventional heavy tanks.

Related Topic: Eurosatory 2026 Official News Online and Web TV 

 The KARPAT CFL-120 is its HITFACT MkII turret developed by Leonardo, and the turret can be equipped with either a 120 mm or 105 mm cannon depending on customer requirement (Picture source: Army Recognition)

The vehicle is built around a combat weight of up to 34 tonnes, placing it well below most modern MBTs, which commonly exceed 60 tonnes. The KARPAT accommodates a crew of four and reaches a maximum road speed of 70 km/h while offering an operational range of approximately 450 kilometers. Its power-to-weight ratio exceeds 21 horsepower per tonne, a figure intended to preserve mobility even when additional protection packages or mission equipment are installed. These characteristics position the vehicle between traditional infantry fighting vehicles and heavier armored combat systems.

A central feature of the KARPAT CFL-120 is its HITFACT MkII turret developed by Leonardo. The turret can be equipped with either a 120 mm or 105 mm cannon depending on customer requirements. The 120 mm configuration allows compatibility with standard NATO ammunition meeting STANAG 4385 and STANAG 4458 requirements. The HITFACT MkII has already been integrated on several wheeled and tracked armored vehicles and is designed to provide stabilized fire while moving, digital fire-control functions, and hunter-killer engagement capability. Such features enable rapid target acquisition and engagement under demanding operational conditions.

CSG describes the vehicle as more than a direct-fire asset. Information presented during the exhibition highlights compatibility with network-enabled warfare architectures, modular protection concepts, and advanced situational awareness systems. These elements reflect the increasing importance of sensor integration and battlefield connectivity across NATO forces. Modern armored units are expected not only to destroy targets but also to exchange information rapidly with reconnaissance assets, command posts, artillery batteries, and unmanned systems operating across the battlespace.

The design philosophy behind the KARPAT CFL-120 appears closely linked to operational lessons emerging from recent conflicts. Many armies face the challenge of maintaining credible armored firepower while reducing deployment constraints associated with heavy tank fleets. A 34-tonne vehicle can be transported more easily by rail, road infrastructure, and tactical transport assets than a traditional MBT. It also imposes lower fuel consumption and maintenance requirements, factors that become increasingly relevant during prolonged operations or deployments across large geographical areas.

In tactical terms, the KARPAT CFL-120 offers a combination of mobility, survivability, and firepower intended for reconnaissance-in-force missions, rapid reaction operations, expeditionary deployments, and support of mechanized formations. Its relatively low silhouette contributes to visual discretion on the battlefield, while the high power-to-weight ratio supports maneuverability across varied terrain. Equipped with a 120 mm cannon, the vehicle can engage armored threats at extended distances while retaining the ability to support infantry units with direct fire. At the same time, its lower mass allows access to bridges and transport networks that may restrict heavier tanks, providing commanders with additional operational flexibility.

The program also illustrates the growing integration of European defense industries. Cooperation between Czech, Italian, Slovak, and Turkish industrial actors demonstrates how multinational partnerships are increasingly used to accelerate development while sharing technological expertise. Such arrangements allow manufacturers to combine mature subsystems rather than starting entirely new programs from scratch. The use of an existing turret family and established automotive solutions may reduce technical risks and shorten the path toward production if customer interest materializes.

Interest in medium-weight armored vehicles has expanded steadily across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia as defense planners reassess force structures in light of evolving threats. While heavy tanks remain indispensable for high-intensity warfare, many nations also seek systems capable of delivering comparable firepower in scenarios where strategic deployability and sustainment are decisive factors. Vehicles such as the KARPAT CFL-120 aim to fill that space by providing direct-fire capability without the full logistical footprint of a modern MBT.

Beyond its technical characteristics, the KARPAT CFL-120 reflects a wider shift in international defense planning. NATO members are investing simultaneously in heavy armor, long-range fires, unmanned systems, and more mobile armored formations capable of responding rapidly to crises along the Alliance's eastern flank and beyond. If vehicles of this category gain wider acceptance, they could influence future procurement strategies by offering a balance between lethality, mobility, and affordability. As European security concerns continue to evolve, systems such as the KARPAT CFL-120 highlight how defense industries are adapting to demands for flexible and deployable combat power across an increasingly contested strategic environment.

Saudi Arabia is expanding World Defense Show as a strategic defense industry platform, with a representative telling Defense Web TV at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris that the next edition will be held from 16 to 20 January 2028 in Riyadh. The event is becoming a key tool for linking foreign defense manufacturers with Saudi localization goals, procurement authorities, domestic companies, and the workforce needed to support long-term military modernization.

Launched by GAMI in 2022, World Defense Show has rapidly grown into one of the main defense exhibitions outside the Western market, with its 2026 edition bringing together 1,486 exhibitors from 89 countries and SAR 33 billion in deals and announcements. Its expansion reflects Saudi Arabia’s broader effort to turn defense procurement into industrial capability, strengthening local production, technology transfer, and future force readiness.

Related topic: Elite French Police BRI Reveals How Armored 4x4 Vehicles Support High-Risk Urban Arrest Tactics.

Defense Web TV interviews the World Defense Show team at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris on the Saudi exhibition’s growth, Vision 2030 defense localization, and preparations for WDS 2028 in Riyadh (Picture source: Army Recognition Group Edit).

The interview at Eurosatory showed why World Defense Show’s organizers treat European defense exhibitions as part of their commercial cycle. The representative said the team was in Paris to meet existing clients, follow market trends, and sell exhibition space for 2028. That matters because the Riyadh event is competing for a fixed pool of international defense marketing budgets, senior military delegations, and product launch schedules. For companies active in armored vehicles, air defense systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, military electronics, naval equipment, secure communications, and sustainment services, early booking is not only about floor space; it can determine access to delegation routes, live demonstration opportunities, national pavilions, and meeting programs connected to Saudi defense institutions.

The strategic background is Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 requirement to localize more than 50 percent of total government spending on military equipment and services by 2030. GAMI reported that the localization rate had reached 24.89 percent by the end of 2024, up from 19.35 percent reported in 2024 and 4 percent in 2018, according to earlier GAMI statements. This means the Kingdom still has a large gap to close before 2030, and exhibitions such as World Defense Show are being used to accelerate licensing, industrial matchmaking, supply chain visibility, and foreign partnership formation.

For foreign defense manufacturers, the Saudi market is therefore less likely to be addressed through direct export sales alone. The operating logic increasingly favors joint ventures, local maintenance facilities, component manufacturing, training pipelines, licensed production, and technology transfer where approved by the exporting state. This is particularly relevant for companies seeking long-term positions in land mobility, air defense, command-and-control systems, electronic warfare, munitions, space-enabled military services, and sustainment. In practical terms, a company showing a combat vehicle, radar, missile system, or unmanned aerial vehicle in Riyadh is also expected to explain how Saudi industry could support maintenance, assembly, subsystem production, software support, or workforce development.

The Saudi Supply Chain Zone mentioned in the interview is one of the clearest examples of this policy approach. In 2026, the zone included more than 50 Saudi small and medium-sized companies across more than 1,700 square meters, with a dedicated content theater and SME spotlight sessions. Its purpose was to expose international contractors to Saudi suppliers that could support in-Kingdom production, maintenance, engineering services, and component-level work. This is important because localization cannot be achieved only through large prime contractors; it requires second- and third-tier suppliers able to deliver repeatable quality, certification compliance, and reliable production schedules.

The interview also emphasized live demonstrations, air displays, and the use of the desert environment around the Riyadh venue. This is operationally relevant because the Saudi armed forces and regional customers operate in conditions that impose specific demands on engines, cooling systems, electro-optical sensors, tires, tracks, batteries, communications equipment, and weapons integration. Demonstrating a wheeled armored vehicle, loitering munition, counter-unmanned aerial system, tactical radio, or air defense sensor in a Middle Eastern test environment gives military buyers more useful information than a static exhibition display alone. The venue also includes aviation infrastructure, with Saudi reporting noting a 2,700-meter runway and aircraft taxiways to support air and integrated demonstrations.

The education component described in the interview should not be treated as an exhibition side activity. World Defense Show’s Future Talent Program engaged 6,049 students across more than 100 entities in 2026, supported by 12 dedicated sessions. That is directly connected to the manpower problem behind defense localization. A domestic defense sector requires mechanical engineers, software engineers, aerospace technicians, cyber specialists, quality-control personnel, pilots, maintenance crews, procurement officials, and program managers. Without that workforce, Saudi Arabia can sign assembly or maintenance agreements but will remain dependent on foreign labor, foreign repair centers, and imported engineering authority.

The 2028 edition will be the next test of whether World Defense Show can move from rapid expansion to institutional consolidation. The official schedule lists 16–20 January 2028 in Riyadh, and the representative interviewed at Eurosatory said rebooking had already begun during and after the 2026 show. The more important measure will not be exhibitor growth alone, but whether the event produces more detailed industrial agreements, clearer procurement pathways, stronger Saudi supplier participation, and measurable progress toward the 2030 localization target.

The main conclusion is that World Defense Show should be assessed as both a defense exhibition and a policy instrument. Its growth reflects Saudi Arabia’s procurement weight, but its long-term relevance will depend on whether contracts and memoranda become local production capacity, trained Saudi personnel, certified suppliers, and military systems that can be sustained inside the Kingdom. That distinction is central for understanding WDS 2028: the issue is not only how many companies exhibit in Riyadh, but how much of Saudi Arabia’s future defense capability is actually designed, integrated, maintained, or produced there.

Explore More Defense News

• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News

FFG has shown an ACSV tracked armored support vehicle at Eurosatory 2026 in Paris with a CONDOR VSHORAD turret and front-mounted mine plough, highlighting how armored formations must now fight through drones, direct-fire threats and mined terrain at the same time. The configuration matters because it brings air defense, counter-UAS protection and route-support capability onto a single tracked platform built to move with frontline units.

The system combines a 30 mm remote-controlled turret, programmable airburst ammunition, 360-degree radar coverage, gunshot detection and optional anti-tank missiles with an 8-ton modular carrier architecture. This gives mechanized forces a mobile protection asset for breaching exposed routes, defeating low-altitude threats and surviving in the layered battlefield now shaping modern land warfare.

Related Topic: FFG's Armoured Combat Support Vehicle Gains Mobile Drone Defense Role with Pulsed-Laser Hard-Kill Module

FFG’s ACSV showcased at Eurosatory 2026 combines a 30 mm CONDOR VSHORAD counter-drone turret, 360-degree sensor coverage, and a front mine plough, highlighting a growing requirement for armored vehicles that can simultaneously defeat aerial threats and breach mined terrain while supporting frontline maneuver forces (Picture Source: Army Recognition Group)

During the 2026 edition of Eurosatory in Paris, German company FFG presented its ACSV tracked armored support vehicle fitted with the CONDOR VSHORAD module based on the EVPU Turra 30 SA remote-controlled turret and equipped with a front-mounted mine plough. The configuration reflects one of the most visible lessons of recent high-intensity warfare: armored maneuver now requires protection against drones, direct-fire threats and mined terrain at the same time. By combining short-range air defense, counter-UAS capability, protected mobility and route-clearing support, the vehicle points to a changing requirement for land forces operating under constant aerial observation and obstacle pressure.

The ACSV presented by FFG is built around the concept of a module-agnostic armored tracked support vehicle able to receive mission packages through standardized mechanical, hydraulic, electrical and data interfaces. In this configuration, the tracked carrier serves as the mobility and integration platform, while the CONDOR VSHORAD module provides the air-defense, counter-UAS and direct-fire functions. The addition of a mine plough at the front of the vehicle gives the system a broader tactical role, extending its use beyond local air defense toward protected route support for mechanized formations. This is particularly relevant in environments where armored units must move through mined approaches while remaining exposed to drones, artillery spotting and ambush threats.

The CONDOR module is centered on a 30 mm main gun architecture compatible with several cannon options, including the 2A42, Mk-44, GTS-30/A and GTS-30/N, with up to 350 rounds indicated for each configuration. This weapon flexibility gives the turret an export-oriented character, as it can potentially be adapted to different ammunition stocks, maintenance practices and procurement preferences. The 30 mm caliber is also increasingly relevant for counter-UAS missions when associated with programmable airburst ammunition, which enables the system to engage small drones and low-signature aerial threats without relying only on missiles. In a battlefield where inexpensive unmanned systems can exhaust high-value air-defense interceptors, gun-based VSHORAD provides a reusable and more scalable layer of protection for forces on the move.

The turret’s secondary armament includes a 7.62 mm machine gun, with options for PKT 7.62 mm or NATO-caliber 7.62 mm weapons and a displayed ammunition capacity of 600 rounds. The module can also integrate anti-tank missiles and smoke grenade options, expanding its ability to respond to armored threats, protect itself during contact and support maneuver through concealment. The turret traverse range of -10° to +70° gives the system the elevation needed to address both ground and aerial targets, including drones flying at low altitude, threats emerging from elevated positions and conventional targets in urban or broken terrain. This makes the ACSV configuration more than a simple carrier for a turret; it becomes a mobile protection platform for units operating close to the forward edge of the battlefield.

Situational awareness is one of the main elements that strengthens the operational relevance of the CONDOR VSHORAD configuration. The system integrates a SATA package that includes the Thunderbullet gunshot detection system for small-arms and sniper-location detection, as well as four Stormguard multi-mission radars providing 360-degree coverage. This sensor arrangement is critical for a VSHORAD vehicle because reaction time often determines whether a drone, loitering munition or nearby ambush can be defeated before it affects the formation. Combined with the 30 mm cannon and programmable airburst ammunition, the radar and acoustic detection suite creates a local sensor-to-shooter loop designed to detect, classify and engage threats around mechanized units.

The ACSV carrier provides the physical and energy foundation needed for this type of mission package. The vehicle offers an 8-ton payload capacity, diesel fuel supply interface under ISO 1179-1, hydraulic supply of 300 to 400 bar at 50 to 70 liters per minute, and electrical outputs including high 24V DC 500A and low 24V DC 25A. These figures matter because modern short-range air-defense modules require power for radars, stabilized sights, remote weapon stations, digital links, sensors and auxiliary systems. The carrier also includes data connections such as four Type N MIL-DTL-83526 interfaces and a KPSE7E16-23S DZ connection, while its mechanical integration is based on a container-type arrangement with six ISO 1161 twistlocks, ten M16 connection points, cargo lashing points and modular cargo panels. Battery options include an Auxiliary Power Booster and an Auxiliary Power Unit, reinforcing the vehicle’s ability to sustain electrically demanding systems.

The mine plough changes the tactical reading of the platform. In recent conflicts, mines have returned as a decisive factor in land operations, slowing armored assaults, canalizing vehicles into kill zones and giving drones more time to detect and track advancing units. A VSHORAD vehicle equipped with a mine plough could support movement through contested terrain while maintaining local protection against aerial threats. This does not make it a dedicated engineering breaching vehicle in the same category as heavy mine-clearing platforms, but it does suggest a concept in which air defense and route-support functions move closer together. For mechanized forces, such an arrangement could help reduce the vulnerability of maneuver elements during the critical phase when they are crossing obstacle belts or advancing along exposed routes.

The strategic implication of FFG’s configuration lies in the convergence of missions on a single tracked platform. For many years, European armies reduced parts of their short-range air-defense capabilities after the Cold War, while engineering, air defense and armored support functions often remained separated across different vehicle fleets. The return of large-scale land warfare, the proliferation of drones and the extensive use of mines have reversed that logic. Armored formations now require mobile systems able to accompany them directly, detect threats quickly, engage low-altitude targets and survive in terrain shaped by obstacles and artillery. The ACSV fitted with the CONDOR module and mine plough reflects this shift toward distributed, mobile and layered protection.

Several aspects remain important to watch as the system evolves, including the type of anti-tank missile that could be integrated, the detection range of the radar suite, the final crew configuration, the protection level of the carrier, ammunition reload arrangements and whether the mine plough configuration is intended for a specific customer requirement or for wider market demonstration. These details will determine how the system could be positioned in future procurement programs. Nevertheless, the configuration already shows how industry is responding to a battlefield where armored mobility, counter-drone defense and survivability against ground threats must be addressed together rather than separately.

FFG’s ACSV with the CONDOR VSHORAD module and mine plough illustrates a wider transformation in armored support vehicles. The combination of a 30 mm remote-controlled turret, programmable airburst ammunition, 360-degree radar coverage, gunshot detection, optional anti-tank missiles, smoke protection, modular power interfaces and an 8-ton payload carrier architecture reflects the growing need for platforms that can protect, move and fight with frontline formations. Its message is clear: future armored maneuver will depend not only on heavier armor or longer-range weapons, but on modular vehicles able to detect, engage and survive across several threat layers at the same time.

Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group

Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.