AUSA 2025: V2X Tempest delivers mobile counter-UAS with dual launchers for rapid layered defense.

V2X introduced Tempest at the Association of the United States Army meeting in Washington in October, presenting a mobile counter-UAS platform built from commercial off-the-shelf components with dual launchers and an integrated detect-to-defeat suite. The company is pitching rapid fieldability and sustainment, aiming at the Army’s push to expand short-range air defense against Class 2 and Class 3 drones in contested environments.

V2X is debuting a light, mobile anti-drone vehicle called Tempest at AUSA 2025 in Washington, describing a COTS-based architecture that detects, tracks, and intercepts Class 2 and Class 3 unmanned aircraft using a layered, dual-launcher configuration. Company materials emphasize fast entry to service, simplified upkeep, and integration with existing command and control networks, aligning with the Army’s public push to accelerate counter-UAS fielding across formations. While V2X’s event notice highlights a new “Tempest” platform introduction, detailed specifications remain limited in open sources, so the description here reflects on-the-record themes from V2X announcements and current Army counter-UAS priorities.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

V2X’s Tempest vehicle with dual launchers and counter-UAS suite at AUSA 2025. (Picture source:  Army Recognition)

The approach relies on standardization. By accepting ISO 20- and 40-foot containers, Marauder fits into existing logistics from pier to area of operations. Interfaces for power, data exchange, and securing points enable loading modules prepared ashore, verified, sealed, and deployed without structural changes. This logic eases reconfiguration between tasks and reduces break-bulk steps, often a sensitive point in distributed architectures.

The platform’s technical parameters steer employment toward endurance. The 3,500-nautical-mile range enables extended transits and long patrols, while speed above 18 knots allows handovers and repositioning within operational windows compatible with varied surface forces. The 40-ton payload, combined with the container format, extends the scope beyond light sensors. It supports modules for mine countermeasures, communications relays, coastal ISR segments, or light maintenance sets. The 150-foot length offers a balance between usable deck area and seakeeping without creating atypical port constraints.

From a tactical and operational perspective, the USV functions as a presence multiplier. It moves payloads close to areas of interest, restores room for maneuver in monitored spaces, and limits crew exposure on contested routes. In an A2/AD environment, it inserts distributed sensors, thickens communications meshes, and sets up low-signature forward replenishment points. Operating without a crew permits prolonged stationing and a different risk posture, notably for repetitive missions that currently draw on frigates or patrol ships. Modularity accelerates the mission cycle because preparation occurs upstream, sheltered from weather, then module swaps happen alongside or on a support ship.

Three elements frame the offer. ISO compatibility creates an ecosystem in which third-party integrators develop payloads without requalifying the hull. Endurance makes regional arc concepts feasible, with temporary support points and rapid switching between roles. Payload capacity enables tangible effects, from naval engineering to sensor support, with an embarkation density difficult to achieve on smaller USVs. Taken together, the solution addresses theater logistics and at-sea payload projection requirements.

On the industrial side, Saronic positions a naval autonomous platform with dual-use applications for support and containerized projection. Presence at AUSA 2025 situates the proposal within an Army–Industry dialogue focused on interoperability and the ability to deliver modular effects without tying up crewed vessels. If adoption of such USVs grows, wider use of containerized and semi-autonomous architectures will alter coastal and blue-water operations by lowering entry thresholds for state and para-public actors. This raises questions for maritime security and common standards, from traffic management and identification to port infrastructure protection. Navies will need to adapt doctrine and maritime policing to integrate uncrewed, endurance-capable, payload-carrying vectors, while the industrial ecosystem will be pressed to stabilize hardware and software interfaces around ISO standards to avoid fragmentation that would hinder interoperability.