Skip to main content

What Is the Tomahawk Missile U.S. President Trump Approved for Ukraine?.


U.S. President Donald Trump announced the U.S. will provide Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, under strict U.S. control. The move marks a major shift in American weapons policy and could reshape the balance of power in Europe.

During an interview on October 6, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that the United States is ready to deliver Tomahawk cruise missiles to allied nations, including Ukraine, under a framework ensuring the missiles remain under U.S. operational control. The decision marks a significant evolution in Washington’s military support model, expanding access to high-precision strike systems while maintaining American command authority. It matters because the deployment of Tomahawks could transform Ukraine’s long-range capabilities and intensify strategic pressure on Russian forces.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link

The Tomahawk is a long-range, subsonic cruise missile used by U.S. forces for precision strikes against high-value targets up to 1,600 km away. Capable of low-altitude flight and GPS guidance, it can be launched from ships, submarines, or land platforms to penetrate enemy defenses with high accuracy. (Picture source: U.S. Department of War)


The Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM), originally developed by Raytheon for the U.S. Navy, is a subsonic, long-range cruise missile capable of precision strikes at distances exceeding 1,600 kilometers. It flies at low altitudes using terrain-following radar and GPS navigation, making it extremely difficult to detect and intercept with standard air defense systems. With a warhead of approximately 450 kilograms, the Tomahawk is capable of destroying hardened command centers, logistics hubs, air defense sites, or critical infrastructure deep behind enemy lines, often in the opening phase of high-intensity operations.

Tactically, this missile transforms a ground force’s ability to conduct deep interdiction strikes far beyond the line of contact. If deployed in Ukraine, the Tomahawk would allow Kyiv to target Russian staging areas, airbases, and command-and-control facilities located far inside Russian-occupied territory and even within internationally recognized Russian borders without using air power. This creates a significant challenge for Russian force protection, as key military installations previously thought safe due to distance would become vulnerable overnight.

Assets capable of launching the Tomahawk include U.S. Navy surface ships such as Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and Ticonderoga-class cruisers, attack submarines, and most relevant to potential Ukrainian use, ground-based mobile or fixed vertical launch systems adapted for the Tomahawk’s specifications. In Ukraine’s case, U.S. and NATO planners are expected to adapt either the existing Mk 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS) or deploy land-based mobile platforms that can be integrated with U.S.-controlled fire coordination software. A precedent exists in the now-defunct U.S. Army's Mid-Range Capability (MRC), part of the Typhon missile system, which uses modified naval launch cells to fire Tomahawks from land.

Delivering Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine would place much of Western Russia’s military infrastructure within reach. This includes strategic airbases, Black Sea Fleet assets in Crimea, and key supply corridors into the occupied Donbas. This changes the calculus for Russian military planners, who would need to divert resources to harden, relocate, or conceal critical nodes previously immune to artillery or HIMARS strikes. Given the missile’s precision and terrain-hugging flight profile, traditional S-300 and even S-400 surface-to-air systems may struggle to intercept it before terminal phase.

The threat posed by a U.S.-controlled Tomahawk deployment is thus not just about range. It is also about timing, unpredictability, and survivability. Unlike manned aircraft or drones, Tomahawks can strike without warning, flying complex routes and striking within a few meters of intended targets. In a conflict where air superiority is contested and Ukrainian pilots face dense air defenses, the ability to strike deep from mobile ground systems without risking crews is a decisive tactical edge.

While President Trump emphasized continued U.S. control over any Tomahawk use, meaning Ukrainian forces would not have unilateral launch authority, the operational effect on the ground remains significant. A shared command structure allows coordinated deep-strike missions with allied intelligence support and targeting precision, while preventing uncontrolled escalation.

The introduction of U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles into the Ukraine theater would mark one of the most substantial capability upgrades since the delivery of HIMARS and Storm Shadow missiles. With this development, Russia must now contend with a battlefield environment where distance no longer guarantees security. This shift may force tactical retreats, dispersed deployments, and costly relocations of critical military infrastructure.

Written by Alain Servaes – Chief Editor, Army Recognition Group
Alain Servaes is a former infantry non-commissioned officer and the founder of Army Recognition. With over 20 years in defense journalism, he provides expert analysis on military equipment, NATO operations, and the global defense industry.


Copyright © 2019 - 2024 Army Recognition | Webdesign by Zzam